
“Head shots are personal”. They are about revenge and leveling scores. And then “the shooter returned along the cow path, moving casually, without the slightest hurry”.
Pete Earley has given his best shot at immortalizing Vladimir Mikhailovich Khrenkov; in literary parlance; and has arguably succeeded. The likes of Connor Fitzgerald have been matched by the unflinching sharpshooter. I really love snipers in stories and Khrenkov is no exception.
Secret Service agencies have for long been interesting writing. But Pete goes one step further by portraying the intel quagmire of
The starkness of contrasting
Back to ‘lethal secrets’ a mish-mash of American, Russian and Chechen realities and biases! Moe the viper is an analogy of the existing warlords in
The book is not mute when it points out that the quest for oil has made villains out of
Holding
In the book individual rivalries and disagreements within the forces and the goodwill between people are at times the issues. Even a bit of sex and harassment finds space in the pages. But I still feel a dearth of research when compared to my favourite, that being Crichton. I would disagree with ‘Pete Earley’s eye for detail’ as suggested by Mike Segar.
Wyatt Conway shall soon be forgotten, so shall be Kimberly Lodge. It is only Khrenkov and Moe who will call the shots in the end. Both are real survivors and I found in them certain integrity of character. I give the book a 3 on 5. That would translate into ‘readable’.